ABSTRACT
Objective@#The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, is a global concern. This study aimed to examine the clinical characteristics, demographics and outcomes of COVID-19 patients in the emergency department (ED) and explore clinical predictors of in-hospital mortality. @*Methods@#This single-center, retrospective, observational study used 1,003 adult patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who went to the ED and were admitted to the hospital between February 28 and September 30, 2020. @*Results@#The median age of the included patients was 55 (37-68) years, and 533 were women (53.1%). Severe COVID-19 was noted in 173 patients (17.2%); seven patients (0.7%) received mechanical ventilation. The mortality rate was 2.1%. Multivariable Cox regression analysis found the risk factors associated with in-hospital death of patients (age >70 years [hazard ratio (HR), 27.411; P70 years, hypoalbuminemia, CURB-65≥3 and thrombocytopenia on admission were independent risk factors for mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Early detection of these predictors and application of CURB-65 score in the ED may provide guidance for appropriate risk stratification at triage and disposition of patients at increased risk of poor prognosis.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#Predictive tools such as the Glasgow Blatchford Score (GBS) and Pre-Rockall Score (PRS) have been used to foresee risks for gastrointestinal patients. This study was undertaken to determine the usefulness of the various available predictive tools in a vulnerable population. @*Methods@#Data of patients with vulnerable upper gastrointestinal bleeding, who visited the emergency room from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018, were retrospectively examined. The GBS and PRS values were determined for all patients. Predictions of therapeutic endoscopy were evaluated with the area under curve (AUC) in the receiver operatory characteristic (ROC) curve. @*Results@#A total of 152 patients were included in the study, 46 of whom required therapeutic endoscopes. In the area below the ROC curve, higher GBS values were obtained as compared to PRS in predicting therapeutic endoscopy (AUC, 0.726; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.648-0.795 vs. 0.705; 95% CI, 0.626-0.776; P=0.689, respectively), transfusion (AUC, 0.861; 95% CI, 0.796-0.912 vs. 0.715; 95% CI, 0.637-0.786; P=0.001, respectively), and 30-day mortality (AUC, 0.698; 95% CI, 0.618-0.770 vs. 0.622; 95% CI, 0.540-0.699; P=0.351, respectively). Considering GBS 0, we determined with 100% sensitivity and 4.72% specificity that endoscopic treatment is redundant. @*Conclusion@#Compared to PRS, GBS excelled in predicting interventional treatment (endoscopy, transfusion) of vulnerable upper gastrointestinal patients, as well as the 30-day mortality. GBS is more useful in predicting low-risk patients that do not require treatment endoscopy, and is therefore a suitable procedure for outpatient care.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak is currently ravaging the world and is a major threat to public health. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at a high risk of acquiring and transmitting COVID-19. Hence, HCWs are also experiencing emotional and behavioral changes. The purpose of this study was to compare emotional changes and stress between occupations and to investigate the impact of emotions of HCWs during the COVID-19 outbreak. @*Methods@#An anonymous, self-administered, previously validated questionnaire was given to HCWs at a hospital dedicated to infectious diseases in Korea during the COVID-19 outbreak. The participants were asked to evaluate stress factors, depressive moods, trauma, reasons for continuing to work, things that helped them work, coping strategies to reduce stress, motivators that could help them work during future outbreaks, and what they would like to do after the outbreak was over. @*Results@#The total number of participants was 400. The average age of participants was 34.69±9.44. Stress and depressive moods showed variations in the job-to-job comparisons. Ethical duty and the professionalism of the HCWs pushed them to continue with their jobs. The news of a decline in the number of patients was helpful to HCWs. The implementation of personal hygiene programs helped in reducing stress. The provision of adequate personal protective equipment was a factor that would encourage them to work during any future outbreak. The participants wanted to go on a trip after the outbreak was over. @*Conclusion@#Our findings indicate that the COVID-19 outbreak had a significant emotional impact on HCWs. The concerns of HCWs may affect their work efficiency in an outbreak and should be addressed by incorporating appropriate management strategies while planning to combat an outbreak.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#Predictive tools such as the Glasgow Blatchford Score (GBS) and Pre-Rockall Score (PRS) have been used to foresee risks for gastrointestinal patients. This study was undertaken to determine the usefulness of the various available predictive tools in a vulnerable population. @*Methods@#Data of patients with vulnerable upper gastrointestinal bleeding, who visited the emergency room from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018, were retrospectively examined. The GBS and PRS values were determined for all patients. Predictions of therapeutic endoscopy were evaluated with the area under curve (AUC) in the receiver operatory characteristic (ROC) curve. @*Results@#A total of 152 patients were included in the study, 46 of whom required therapeutic endoscopes. In the area below the ROC curve, higher GBS values were obtained as compared to PRS in predicting therapeutic endoscopy (AUC, 0.726; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.648-0.795 vs. 0.705; 95% CI, 0.626-0.776; P=0.689, respectively), transfusion (AUC, 0.861; 95% CI, 0.796-0.912 vs. 0.715; 95% CI, 0.637-0.786; P=0.001, respectively), and 30-day mortality (AUC, 0.698; 95% CI, 0.618-0.770 vs. 0.622; 95% CI, 0.540-0.699; P=0.351, respectively). Considering GBS 0, we determined with 100% sensitivity and 4.72% specificity that endoscopic treatment is redundant. @*Conclusion@#Compared to PRS, GBS excelled in predicting interventional treatment (endoscopy, transfusion) of vulnerable upper gastrointestinal patients, as well as the 30-day mortality. GBS is more useful in predicting low-risk patients that do not require treatment endoscopy, and is therefore a suitable procedure for outpatient care.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak is currently ravaging the world and is a major threat to public health. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at a high risk of acquiring and transmitting COVID-19. Hence, HCWs are also experiencing emotional and behavioral changes. The purpose of this study was to compare emotional changes and stress between occupations and to investigate the impact of emotions of HCWs during the COVID-19 outbreak. @*Methods@#An anonymous, self-administered, previously validated questionnaire was given to HCWs at a hospital dedicated to infectious diseases in Korea during the COVID-19 outbreak. The participants were asked to evaluate stress factors, depressive moods, trauma, reasons for continuing to work, things that helped them work, coping strategies to reduce stress, motivators that could help them work during future outbreaks, and what they would like to do after the outbreak was over. @*Results@#The total number of participants was 400. The average age of participants was 34.69±9.44. Stress and depressive moods showed variations in the job-to-job comparisons. Ethical duty and the professionalism of the HCWs pushed them to continue with their jobs. The news of a decline in the number of patients was helpful to HCWs. The implementation of personal hygiene programs helped in reducing stress. The provision of adequate personal protective equipment was a factor that would encourage them to work during any future outbreak. The participants wanted to go on a trip after the outbreak was over. @*Conclusion@#Our findings indicate that the COVID-19 outbreak had a significant emotional impact on HCWs. The concerns of HCWs may affect their work efficiency in an outbreak and should be addressed by incorporating appropriate management strategies while planning to combat an outbreak.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#This study described the effectiveness of the one-stop treat system (OTS) and the improvements characterizing the patients who come to an emergency medical center via the one-stop treat system for heavily drunken people @*Methods@#An observational retrospective study was conducted on patients, aged 19 years or older, who visited the emergency department (ED) from January 2014 to December 2017 with alcohol intoxication (AI). The subjects were divided into two groups, that is, AI patients who come to ED directly or those who came via OTS. We compared and analyzed the characteristics of two groups including gender, age, date, mode of the ED visit, level of consciousness, diagnosis, ED length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and final outcomes. @*Results@#A total of 8,144 patients were enrolled in the study. There were 2,221 AI patients who visited ED directly and 5,923 AI patients who visited ED via OTS. Patients arriving via OTS had more medical or surgical problems than the patients who came directly from the ED. Discharged patients via OTS showed a longer ED LOS (312 minutes [range, 169-520 minutes], P<0.001). Compared with patients who came directly from ED, the patients via OTS showed a higher admission rate (10.7% vs. 3.4%, respectively; P<0.001), and a higher death rate in ED (0.6% vs. 0%, respectively; P<0.001). @*Conclusion@#Compared the characteristics of the patients from ED directly in 2014-2017, the patients via OTS had higher severity and admission rate, and a longer ED LOS. Our findings suggest that we should pay attention to patients via OTS because the patients have high severity of illness.